It has been an eventful year for Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire personalities. And over the last several months, many in Big and Mid Eva have glommed onto Andrew Tate as a punching bag for them to milk for content, but most did not understand the appeal of Andrew Tate. The appeal of Andrew Tate is that he provides a better solution than embracing the suck. It’s not a righteous solution, but it stands in contrast to mediocrity.
The issue of marriage is where this is highlighted, perhaps the most. Andrew Tate argues that a man should never get married under the current system which disadvantages men. Instead, he believes that men should get rich, sleep around, and provide for their many children. The mantra goes: “If you can’t change the game, win the game.”
Matt Walsh was initially discussing adultery and highlighted how adultery is a sin against one’s wife and God. I would highlight that the 3rd and the 7th Commandments are therefore violated. Andrew Tate agreed with Walsh on oathkeeping which is why Tate advises men not to make take the oath in the first place. Walsh responds:
The set up you describe, where men have children by lots of different women, has already been tried. We’ve seen it in primitive cultures and we see it today in the most dysfunctional, filthy, and crime ridden communities in America. This kind of set up is “natural” in the sense that it appeals to our most base and uncivilized impulses. It’s primitive and animalistic, which is why it is so commonly found in the animal kingdom. Reptiles and monkeys behave this way. But we are human beings.
Monogamy and the nuclear family call us to something higher. It’s not natural but supernatural. Man and wife become one at the altar in a mystical though still very real way. This is perhaps a riskier and more difficult path, but a man should not shy away from the riskier and more difficult path. The greatest happiness and most meaningful successes in life are found down this path.
Matt Walsh goes right there, contrasting Western civilization to undeveloped civilizations. He also brings up ghetto babymama culture, where one man with numerous babymamas or one woman with various babydaddies is commonplace.
Christian media is unwilling to make these arguments against the Manosphere because of racism, but pointing out that Europe is more successful than the Arab and African world in part because of monogamy is actually one of the best arguments against polygamy. Monogamy is God’s ideal, and the natural consequences of polygamy in a culture over time breed degeneration predispositions into populations. If one culture executes criminals, and the other lets them breed in harems, this will have ramifications for the stock of a people. Thus, monogamy has been a boon for the West.
Matt Walsh also, correctly, argues that risk aversion is unmanly. Walsh continues:
One other point: if you want boys to become men, you cannot leave them to be raised almost entirely by women. Boys need the daily guidance and example that can only be provided by a man who lives in the home and has committed himself to that family and that family alone.
You are the captain of the ship. You need to be on the ship. You need to eat and sleep there and walk the deck with your crew. You need to be there when the storms come.
This is the Fight Club argument, whereby a generation raised by single mothers does not know how to be men. Walsh argues that this is the inevitable result of absent playboy fathers, and he’s right. After all, Elon Musk agrees with Tate, and one of his sons is a transvestite. So no amount of money can make someone a successful father.
Matt Walsh makes the compelling argument against the manosphere not just appealing to the Bible, but aggressively attacking the arguments Tate is making, unafraid of being called racist or offending effeminates.
Powered by RedCircle
One Response
All excuses of bitch men who won’t demand that alimony be banned. Alimony was created by the Catholic Church to attack men. Look it up. And women have jobs now and ita easier for them to find a job than a man due to feminism destroying society. Unless Matt Walsh publicly opposes alimony he is a little bitch like Tate.