In British politics, it has largely been baked into the cake that Nigel Farage will be the next Prime Minister under the Reform Party, but this has not been without scandals which often have correlated with driving out potential competition for the party leadership. Rupert Lowe was one such man driven from the Reform party over fake scandals and has since launched his Restore Britain party which promises Mass Remigration.
This past week, Lowe released his Rape Gang Inquiry Report which was crowdfunded by over twenty-thousand which details the pattern of behavior from largely Pakistani Muslim immigrants to Britain and the horrific sexual crime they perpetrate that went unabated by government institutions. This would include police, NHS, schools, and other social care services. They estimated that a minimum of 250,000 were violated by foreign rapists imported under the 1948 British Nationality Act, which is their equivalent of America’s Hart-Cellar Act.
In the forward to the report, Lowe wrote the following:
I am grateful to everyone on my team who has contributed to exposing this demonic chapter in Britain’s history. A combination of the paralysing fear of ‘racism’ accusations and the scramble for votes from imported foreign sub-cultures meant that pure evil was allowed to metastasise. Nor is the horrendous ordeal over. The root cause was immigration, beginning with the British Nationality Act 1948 and escalating under Tony Blair from 1997 onwards. Believing proud nations to be responsible for the mid-20th century destruction of Europe, our post-war leaders embraced diversity and multiculturalism as the supposedly civilised alternative. This report establishes beyond any doubt that this ‘open society’ obsession has in fact enabled untold barbarism of its own. Oil and water do not mix and cultural differences, going back centuries, are the genesis of this problem.
Without equivocation, he blames the immigration policy that was inherently rooted in the “post-war leaders.” This is functionally describing the so-called Post War Consensus wherein love of nation was faulted for World War II, so therefore the nations “embraced diversity and multiculturalism” to prevent such wars from recurring. Despite Britain being on the winning side, they were blamed for what happened. The comparison of oil and water goes so far as to label such diversity irreconcilable in an era of “racial reconciliation.”
The Executive Summary of the report blames Islamic culture directly for the rape gangs.
The demographic and cultural drivers are clear. Perpetrators from Pakistani Muslim and other Muslim backgrounds operated under an honour- and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially white working class girls, as property available for sexual use. This pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam. These include the doctrine of Muslim superiority drawn from Quranic verses that position Muslims at the top with a duty to correct non-believers. The gang members’ justification for their crimes can be found in the Islamic principles of loyalty and disavowal known as al-walā’ wa-l-barā’. It demands enmity towards non-Muslims, the superiority of men over women, forced marriage combined with the absence of any fixed minimum age of consent, the perception of female sexuality as inherently dangerous, a system of sex slavery that authorises sexual relations with non-Muslim captives, and a religiously sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non-Muslims. These elements, filtered through clannish immigrant sub-cultures, provided religious justification that enabled the systematic rape and even slaughter of White British girls.
The Pakis are described as having an ethno-religious superiority complex which justifies their mistreatment of white British girls for gross sexual gratification. Their communities then protect them which enables further abuse and other practices. Regarding the debate over whether this is a Pakistani problem or an Islam problem, the report leans towards blaming Islam. Islam is not the only religion that posits an ethno-religious superiority complex. Such behaviors might not be perpetuated by the most devout in the name of Allah, but instead are the product of their culture, regardless of personal religiosity. African countries also have a rape culture which is partially responsible for the spread of HIV/AIDS.
The contents of the report contain testimonies from numerous victims under assumed aliases. One of the recurrent patterns was the lower class, broken homes, that was consistent in the victims’ background. The breakdown of the family, caused by both cultural and economic decay of Britain, made these young girls susceptible to sexual predation.
The practice of giving gifts to these downtrodden girls was a pattern. A daughter of Sally was gifted a “gold chain” while numerous women in the report were given alcohol and cigarettes from the older men. Alcohol was commonly used to induce sex.
The first victim, Chloe, was a horrid account of a girl from a broken family that was subject to abuse in the home, so she lacked a male relative whom she could trust. She then became lured into groups of Muslims which ultimately led to her being trafficked as a pre-teen. Police did not investigate evidence of rape, while social services (and her own mother) did nothing about her abusive home. A social worker even tried to pimp her to a production company to play a victim of abuse. She became impregnated by a Paki who sought an “Islamic marriage” with her. Only after becoming a mother did she attempt to change her life and sought help.
Another victim, Fiona, was trafficked at a “party house” by either Pakistani or Indian men.
When Fiona’s mother called the police to report her daughter missing and mentioned a history of abuse by Asian men, the call handler told her: “You can’t describe them as Asian men because that’s racist. You should just be glad your child is being taught a different culture.”
Being racist was worse than being raped, according to the police. This is very similar to the American Community Relations Service which seeks to coerce whites into not blaming blacks for instances of black-on-white racialized violence. As Norm MacDonald joked, “What terrifies me is if ISIS were to detonate a nuclear device and kill 50 million Americans. Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims?” This has become the reality in both Britian and America.
There are other appalling instances, one of which describes the use of dogs, but the report further details whistleblower accounts that describe the governmental failures that perpetuated abuse as a matter of policy. There is an analysis of the criminal convictions between 2005-2017 which found that 84% of those convicted for “group-based child sexual exploitation” were Pakistani or otherwise South Asian.
Modern Gibeah
Judges 19-20 recounts a dark tale in Israel’s history during a lawless period where there was no king. A Levite sought after his concubine who “played the harlot” to reclaim her, and he did. On his return, he stays in Gibeah, of the tribe of Benjamin, where the locals had lewd intentions that mirror the Sodomites in Genesis 19. They proceed to gangrape the concubine to the point of death. Grieved, the Levite cuts her body postmortem and sends the pieces to the tribes in a call for justice. Israel answers the call and ultimately goes to war against Benjamin, nearly annihilating one of the twelve tribes.
Matthew Henry wrote the following regarding the Sons of Bilial in Gibeah:
They designed in the most filthy and abominable manner (not to be thought of without horror and detestation) to abuse the Levite, whom perhaps they had observed to be young and comely: Bring him forth that we may know him… Those that are guilty of it are ranked in the New Testament among the worst and vilest of sinners, and such as shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Now, (1.) This was the sin of Sodom, and is thence called Sodomy. The Dead Sea, which was the standing monument of God’s vengeance upon Sodom, for its filthiness, was one of the boundaries of Canaan, and lay not many miles off from Gibeah. We may suppose the men of Gibeah had seen it many a time, and yet would not take warning by it, but did worse than Sodom (Ezekiel 16:48), and sinned just after the similitude of their transgression.
Henry ultimately posits that the severity of the crime warranted fear of divine reprisal, much the same as occurred in the judgment of Sodom and Gomorrah. The refusal to relinquish the malefactors for justice rendered the tribe of Benjamin “guilty, ex post facto—as accessaries after the fact.”
What transpired in Britain, often perpetuated by the State, was the sin of Gibeah at scale. The state is guilty of harboring the vilest of criminals. The ethnic blocs that harbor this criminality bear direct guilt for these crimes and so are collectively guilty. Mass remigration is the merciful solution.
A Complicit Church
The moral decay is very rooted in the upbringings of the victims, but the institutional actions of Christian denominations will fail to redress the problems happening. Furthermore, the institutional church has been complicit in promoting the ideologies that resulted in migrant rape in the UK and immigrant fraud in the US. Lest the papist get too arrogant, the Catholic Church elected an American to the papacy because he promotes mass migration, and he has made numerous statements that would rebuke mass remigration of immigrant populations.
The ARP statement enshrines Civil Rights Ideology as Christian dogma and would penalize any who articulated that multiculturalism is a failed policy. Arguing that white culture is superior to the rape-enabling Pakistani culture is by definition “white supremacy” and so would have one condemned by their own church.
The PCA report on Christian Nationalism desires the flourishing nation but condemns one who believes “ethnic homogeneity as a positive good to be pursued through civil law.” Diversity has been proven to break down social trust, and immigration functions as an economic wealth transfer from natives to foreigners. Ethnic homogeneity would have prevented these horrific crimes from taking place, along with countless others across the West.
Even the Southern Baptist Convention passed an amnesty resolution that condemned nativism while they sponsored daycare “ministries” for fraudulent refugees who leech off the American people.
There is no major sect that is not actively promoting the failed policies that deteriorated their respective nations in favor of immigrant populations. They strain at the gnat of so-called white supremacy while saying nothing of the ubiquitous immigrant crimes. They will gladly publish statements against antisemitism, but nothing against the anti-white policies that are prolific in the West. When Stephen Wolfe said that “white people are their own in-group’s out-group,” this has largely been the modus operandi of the Church.
Institutional Christianity will be the final vanguard of the failed post-war liberalism which has accelerated the decay of the West. Unfortunately, it will require the politics to change while the church will, in many ways, have lagged behind the culture by a decade. What Lowe described as “oil and water” which does not mix, Trump more boldly ascribed to “poisoning the blood.” It will require the Rupert Lowes and the Donald Trumps of the world to change the political landscape to the extent that it impacts the church.
In the past decade alone, there has been a massive global shift against immigration, especially legal immigration. There is a conservative shift in the seminaries, and pastors are complaining that it is in the pews. The next generation has rejected these failed ideologies that justify their ethnic despoilment. The church must forgo its anti-white sentiments lest it be as sons of Belial during an existential crisis in the fight for the West.
