Tucker Carlson is one of the most controversial men in America and also one of the most influential. Few individuals have driven as many news cycles and conversations as he has. But with all of these things established, there is a pressing concern that Tucker Carlson, in waking up to Jewish influence in American politics, has softened his opposition to Islam. There is an ongoing debate as to whether Christians and Muslims can or should form a political alliance, and Carlson has certainly interviewed people who believe its possible. But where does Tucker Carlson stand on the issue?
Also sharing these concerns is Auron MacIntyre, one of the good guys over at Blaze TV whose more of a political scientist on the right than a news podcaster. Nevertheless, MacIntyre is America First without being a reputational sperg. In an interview that aired last Friday, MacIntyre pressed Tucker Carlson on the issue of Islam.
AURON MACINTYRE
But a lot of people who have heard you speak—and I’ll be honest, at times I have felt the same way—have heard you speak about Islam in a manner which seems like it might be okay if Islam became a major religion in the United States, if it became, uh, something that was a common feature in the West. And just looking at what’s happening in Europe and increasingly in the United States, it’s very clear that perhaps Islamic populations, if they are not the hammer, at the very least they seem to be the anvil of breaking Western civilization. And personally, uh, while I think it’s fantastic—you know, as you say, we should not hate people and I’m more than happy for Muslims to live in their lands in peace and security and have prosperous lives—I just don’t want them in the West. I think that they’re incompatible with Christian religion and civilization. And I’m seeing the evidence of this sprouting up in places like Texas where we’re building record numbers of mosques, this kind of thing. And I think a lot of people would just like to hear ultimately that this is something that is not a long-term expectation in the West, that it’s okay if we deport Muslims that should not be here and we ban Muslim immigration, while still understanding that we don’t need to make them our eternal enemies abroad.
TUCKER CARLSON
Yeah. I mean, I’m for preserving the demographic mix of America from 1969, the year I was born. Okay? Demographic, racial mix, linguistic, religious. So that was an amazing country I was born into. Still amazing—much less amazing because of demographic changes. So I don’t know if I could be clearer about that. The reason that I often make that point—and I know that it’s, I mean, basically the hatred of Muslims, Muslims, whatever that means—is that’s like the main effect of 9/11. Now what was 9/11? Well, we don’t know because the US government won’t declassify documents that are 25 years old. So we’re kind of guessing, right? But I know the effect of it. It had two effects.
One was to scare the crap out of everyone in the United States about Islam as a religion. I certainly felt that way. And two was to dramatically increase Muslim immigration into the United States. And that was embedded by the very same people who were pushing all these Middle Eastern wars. Huh. So I guess I just note something very obvious to us: we’re getting played. Okay. Islam may be the anvil. It’s definitely not the hammer. Um, okay, that’s just a fact. Same in Europe. Who pushed for massive Islamic immigration into Europe and Scandinavia, the Nordic countries? It wasn’t the—it was the same people who have banned any criticism of what’s happening in Gaza. Huh. So okay, that’s the first thing I would note.
Second thing I would note is that radical Islam—and I spent many years traveling, 25 years traveling in the Middle East, in almost every country in the Middle East and a lot of time there—and radical Islam has declined as a political force and I’m glad. I’m really grateful. Radicalism was a real force in Europe, but in the actual Middle East, maybe because all the crazies moved to Europe, I don’t know, but it’s just a fact. And there has been a concurrent rise in religious extremism, in political religious expression, and it’s among Jews and it’s among evangelical Christians. And the millennialist vision—this kind of marrying your eschatology to your politics—that is a phenomenon still. It’s a super dangerous phenomenon. And that’s going on among evangelical Christians, a minority of evangelical Christians, and a minority of Jews. But that’s where religious radicalism is rising.
I know this because I live here and I travel a lot. So that’s not an attack on anybody. It’s just… and the third thing is that there is clearly an effort to ferment religious conflict in the United States. And having seen religious conflict and traveled to sites of religious conflict and watched its generational effects, I don’t want that here.
So I don’t want anyone to come here. Trump has not shut down immigration into this country. In fact, it’s accelerated in ways that are really destructive, which is to say through legal means—H-1Bs, refugee resettlement. That’s still ongoing. That has not stopped. In other words, the demographic change in the United States is still proceeding apace. And if you tell yourself, well, they shut down the borders—they did, and God bless Trump for doing that—but that doesn’t mean that the replacement of the population of the United States has stopped. No, it’s accelerated. So, um, legally, into that mix, if you throw encouragement to hate people on the basis of their religion—not their behavior, but just their religion—you’re going to destroy the country that my grandchildren, I hope, will inherit. And who is doing that? Well, it’s the same people pushing for the war with Iran, a war that has no conceivable benefit to the United States.
So I’m not, by the way, a champion of Islam at all. I’m a Christian more so than ever, and I mean it in a more heartfelt way than ever. And by Christian, I mean pro-Jesus, okay? Pro-Jesus. Mike Huckabee doesn’t talk a lot about Jesus because he’s not allowed to or something, but I believe in Jesus and his example, and I believe that Jesus is the only way to God. So obviously I’m not a Muslim. By definition I’m not. But I don’t want religious conflict here. And these people—a lot of, not these, some people—are pushing for it.
Tucker Carlson affirms that Islam is not compatible with the West and takes a hardline stance against legal immigration and its impact on the demography of America. He warns of the growing fanaticism of Jews in the Middle East, alluding to the mystical religion of the Mizrahi Jews in Israel. He then agrees that Islam is not the hammer and acknowledges that its perhaps the anvil.
Carlson would later decry the manipulation of Christians to support Israel, as the neocons who want to fight wars in the Middle East also want to import millions of Muslims, citing George W. Bush as an example. He likens calling this out to how he called out Tim Keller, Russell Moore, and Big Eva for their promotion of open borders and Covid vaccines, providing a consistent throughline for his positions.
Overall, this was a productive conversation that clarified Tucker Carlson’s positions on pressing matters of concern that had his supporters uneasy.
Powered by RedCircle
3 Responses
Islam should be banned in all public education settings as it endorses pedophilia and its founder “married” a 6 year old and raped her at the age of 9. I don’t know if Mohammed actually existed after reading Robert Spencers book on the topic but this characterization of Mohammed as a pedophile is endorsed by all Islamic sects. It is also lauded by them and so discussion of this so called religion in school is a danger to children. “Islam is incompatible with the West” is the greatest understatement of the right in politics today.
I think the Mason’s basic idea was replacing Europeans with Muslims and Americans with “Judeo-Christians”. Because not everyone got the memo, the Muslims also appeared in America, while the “Judeo-Christians” desperately tried to “evangelize” Europe. Both weren’t supposed to show up in the “wrong” place.
In the end both endeavors will fail thanks to the invention of the Internet. The Internet just beats conspiring in lodges or on private islands every time. The latter is just a outdated strategy from the medieval past.
judaism and islam are both threats to the West.
judaism is the MUCH bigger threat, because the jews subvert the West from within.
The muslims are a symptom: they wouldn’t be in the West if the jews hadn’t brought them here to use as a weaponized demographic against White people.
The jews are the underlying disease which cause symptoms such as third world immigration, open borders, multiculturalism, diversity, cultural marxism, sexual degeneracy, the destruction of the West’s will to survive, and all of the other subversive ideologies that are destroying the West.
The jews are to the West, what the AIDS virus is to a human body.
Just as the AIDS virus weakens the human body so that it can no longer defend itself against threats, in the same way the jews subvert and undermine and destroy the West from within, in order to divide and conquer and achieve jewish supremacy.
To quote Cicero:
“”A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. For the traitor appears not a traitor – He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims….He rots the soul of a nation – he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city – he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.”
Another version of the Cicero quote:
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.”
Both of these quotes, attributed to Cicero, describe how the jews destroy the West from within.
As mentioned above, the muslims would NOT even be in the West in the first place, if the jews hadn’t subverted the West from within, using (((their))) influence to open our borders, while (((brainwashing))) Westerners into believing that “racism” is bad, and “diversity is our strength.”
The jews are using the muslims and other third worlders as weaponized demographics to overwhelm and destroy White people in our own countries.
That is why the jews are relentlessly importing third world immigrants into the West.
The jews are the CAUSE of muslim immigration into the West.
Due to the jews’ ability to blend in and gain positions of influence (media, government, academia, law, etc) and subvert and undermine and destroy Western society from within, the jews are the MUCH bigger threat to the west.
The muslims stab you in the front.
The jews pretend to be your friend, and then stab you in the back, while telling you that you deserve it for being “racist” and ‘bigoted” and “xenophobic.”
The jewish subversive 5th column within the West is MUCH more of a threat than the muslims.
As mentioned above, the ONLY reason the muslims are in the West, is because the jews intentionally brought the muslims here, to use as a weaponized demographic.
The jews are the bigger threat to the West, by FAR.