Matt Walsh is well-known for hot takes that generate much online controversy, and his latest take on Amber Rose speaking at the Republican National Convention. Amber Rose is best known for being an e-thot who has dated several celebrities. Despite being pro-abortion and selling pornography, the RNC invited her to speak. Matt Walsh, unsurprisingly, called out this massive blunder creating much backlash among the Classical Liberals.
The RNC gives a primetime speaking slot to a pro-abortion feminist and self-proclaimed slut with a face tattoo whose only claim to fame is having sex with rappers. Truly an embarrassment. Not a single voter will be mobilized by this person.
Who exactly is influenced by Amber Rose? Hardcore feminists or Black men who somehow find her attractive? The former is not going to vote for Donald Trump. And the latter is going to be extremely difficult to turn out. But the backlash of having a pornographer speak at the RNC is far more risky. Does the person who was voting for Biden but Amber Rose convinced to vote for Trump even exist? I’m pressing x to doubt.
Walsh followed up responding to the controversy.
First of all, maybe Rose has totally changed and had some kind of conversion experience. There’s no evidence of that. Only that she likes Donald Trump now. There are many many many examples of conservatives rallying around their new celebrity hero just because the person likes Trump, only to be humiliated and betrayed by that same person shortly after. This has happened countless times. I’ve called it ahead of time in nearly every case and been screamed at by conservatives the way you all are screaming at me now. Hopefully this is the first time I’ll be wrong about something likely this but I highly doubt it.
Second, even if there has been some kind of conversion, that doesn’t mean you take someone who has been a conservative for 42 seconds and turn them into a mouthpiece for your movement. Again: HOW MANY TIMES DO WE NEED TO LEARN THIS LESSON? A person who has been wrong about everything up until approximately yesterday morning needs to be learning and listening, not giving prime time speeches at a political convention.
Third, just to give you an idea of how new Rose’s conversion is — if there has been one at all — it was just this past March that she praised the Satanic Temple for “helping a lot of people” by making sure they can get abortions. That was March. Of this year. She has not even pretended to disavow that point of view, or any of her far left views, apart from her dislike of Trump. If it is outrageous and offensive to suggest that a person such as this is perhaps not fit to be a prime time Republican speaker, then conservatism as a movement is in even worse shape than I thought.
In conclusion: come on, guys. What the hell.
Matt Walsh stated the obvious, yet many contend that a grander strategy is at play here. Given that the GOP had multiple demonic prayers, it’s unlikely the people running the show are geniuses. The Republican Party should not be having ugly sluts speak to our politics and convention. Its speakers should be aspirational, not appealing to the lowest common denominator of people.
One Response
The RNC is trying to reach the forgotten citizenry and they are wise to use whoever they can to reach those who have been brainwashed and gaslit for decades. I think Matt is being very harsh towards Amber Rose. She will reach those who follow her and that would mean thousands, correct? I don’t know her but she had sense enough to thank her father who probably voted Democrat for a long time too. The RNC is all over the place with their policies regarding abortion and that’s sad but this nation as a whole is a mess and immigration must be dealt with and not just with executive orders which are complete trash. I truly hope that J.D. Vance runs after Trump wins in four years and continues to manage our countries finances and illegal borders the right way.