Christian News By Christians, For Christians.

JD Hall vs Jon Harris Woke Wars II Worsens

JD Hall vs Jon Harris Woke Wars II Worsens

Woke Wars II is what we have called for years the divide among those who refused to adopt Critical Race Theory, but have since divided over whether to go woke for Jews. Replace Black with Jew and slavery with Holocaust and wokeness can continue business as usual. As often stated, it is the same war.

Jon Harris played a critical role in Woke Wars I not only bringing information to a new medium, he also brought a lot of people together and was a glue holding many personalities together. At the onset of Woke Wars II, Harris remained uncompromised. But eventually his role as a glue went away as multiple personalities went in different directions, as did his personal and professional interests.

And sometime in the last years, his views and positions shifted, along with his focus. And his audience noticed. And most of his videos now fail the 10% views/subscriber benchmark on YouTube. His most successful video all year, however, was his closet dispensationalist video based on his 9902 word apologetic.

Jon Harris’s article where he quotemined Patristics and Puritans to ultimately argue that Genesis 12:3 only applies to modern Jews, against the beliefs of almost all he cited, received a lot of praise from Eric Metaxes and Rod Martin. It was a longer version of the typical Jewish propaganda published at Christian Post. And we critiqued it here.

After seeing Rod Martin rave about the article, JD Hall offered his own critique. JD Hall affirms the future restoration of Jews in Romans 11 but articulates that there’s an ingathering of every nation, rendering Jews not special. He points out how those whom Harris quotemined did not support dispensationalism. But most distinctly from my critique, JD Hall took issue with Harris poisoning the well by comparing opponents to Muslims and Black Hebrew Israelites in the beginning and going on to invoke Haman in an imprecatory fashion.

Both of us concluded that it was a bait and switch to use historic support for the Ingathering to promote a view that is distinctly dispensational.

But Harris chided me for not thinking in categories and JD Hall for “slop,” a term ironically popularized from “goyslop.”  But Harris has not meaningfully engaged with critics other than to attack their intellects.

Regarding this, Hall wrote:

The article was designed to be run up the flagpole to the Israel lobby, to say, “I’m here. Look at me. See me.” And to capitalize on what opportunities that lobby has to offer him. Defending the article was never in his agenda to-do list.

And he’s right. It got that level of attention and maybe it will pan out for him. But maybe Harris already had that attention and wrote the article because of that. After all, he did take a trip to Israel early this year, and Israel is in the business of wooing influencers with Potemkin tours. Even the CrossPolitic hosts got one. I don’t know, but this article was beneath the Jon Harris who fought Critical Race Theory.

Powered by RedCircle

Receive the Evangelical Dark Web Newsletter

Get Christian news in your inbox. Sign up and receive a free copy of Winning Not Winsome.

Support the Evangelical Dark Web

By becoming a member of Evangelical Dark Web, you get access to more content, help drive the direction of our research, and support the operations of the ministry.
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
Reddit
LinkedIn

One Response

  1. The proper and appropriate way to debate the “Christian” zionists and dispensationalists and other shills for the jews, is to recognize that they are extremely evil traitors.

    Don’t treat the “Christian” zionists and dispensationalists as honest debaters, because they AREN’T.

    They are mendacious gaslighters, deceivers, manipulators, and satanic LIARS, and should be treated as such.

    When debating with these traitors, go on the offensive: accuse them of being exactly what they are: traitors who side with the evil jews against their own people.

    The dispensationalists and “Christian” zionists have chosen to betray their own people, because they believe that their evil, depraved, monstrous, antichrist, jewish supremacist version of “god” will reward them for betraying their own people and helping the jews to enslave Gentiles.

    That is the very definition of a TRAITOR: a person who betrays their own people and sides with the (((enemies))) of their own people, in the expectation of receiving rewards for their treason.

    And it gets worse: the “Christian” zionists/dispensationalists try to intimidate and terrorize everyone into worshipping the jews, with manipulative gaslighting and threats such as “if you oppose the jews, god will send you to hell!!!!!”

    The “Christian” zionists and dispensationalists are evil s]t]n]c TRAITORS and LIARS, who belong to their father the devil.

    When debating the dispensationalists and “Christian” zionists, constantly remind them that they are traitors to their own people, and traitors to Christ.

    Don’t allow the “Christian” zionists and dispensationalists to claim good faith. Don’t treat them as if they are acting in good faith.

    The dispute between REAL Christians and the “Christian” zionists/dispensationalists isn’t simply a theological debate. It’s a fight between good (real Christians), and evil (dispensationalists and “Christian” zionists).

    When debating the “Christian” zionists and dispensationalists, go on the offensive. Remind them that they are TRAITORS. Remind them that they are evil, demonic, and satanic.

    Don’t treat the “Christian” zionists/dispensationalists as Christians who simply have a differing theological opinion.

    Treat them as traitors, enemies, and servants of the devil.

Leave a Reply

Receive the Evangelical Dark Web Newsletter

Get Christian news in your inbox. Sign up and receive a free copy of Winning Not Winsome.
Join 8,116 other subscribers

Trending Posts