Christian News By Christians, For Christians.

Lindsay Clancy

Candace Owens Defends Lindsay Clancy: Obviously Not Guilty

The SSRI wine aunts are pouring their support upon the unworthy Lindsay Clancy, who has pleaded not guilty by reason of temporary insanity to the murder of her 3 children. Not to be left out of the conversation is Candace Owens.

As previously summarized on Evangelical Dark Web:

Clancy knew what she was doing. The timeline shows calculation. She chose the moment her husband was gone. She performed a self-harm that would not kill her. She hung from the window and dropped, shaving five feet off what should have been a pedestrian twelve-to-fourteen-foot leap from a second-story window. What was intended to produce a broken leg or ankle, even a concussion, ended instead in a broken nervous system. The plan failed when the fall left her paralyzed rather than merely wounded. That does not transform the murders into something less than murder. It transforms the defense into a calculated second act.

There is an actual conspiracy theory to be had here: Lindsay Clancy embellished mental deterioration with journal entries and faked an attempted suicide with the intent to get off on the insanity plea.

But Candace Owens prefers true crime slop to a criminal conspiracy.

The facts that Clancy is the one who murdered her own children is not even disputed by the defense. Although the defense would have an easier time on insanity plea because it unduly raises the threshold for a criminal conviction to not only be beyond a reasonable doubt, but beyond a reasonable doubt that the person was not temporarily insane while committing the act than they would without it.

But Candace Owens blames the nefarious Big Pharma. And while pharmaceuticals played a role, Clancy shopped for doctors and played the broken system. She had a supportive husband and went to doctors.

But no amount of drugs should make someone not guilty of a crime or make drunken vehicular homicide excusable. 

The Tyler Robinson Grift

Candace Owens has painted herself into a corner with conspiracy slop. She claims to have been supportive of Lindsay Clancy from day one, from 2023. However, there is no public comment from her on this case until August 20, 2026. This trial has been ongoing for a while also, as I had been keeping tabs on it. So her claim to have held the same conviction for years appears unfounded, thus disingenuous.

Candace Owens has peaked in popularity, peddling conspiracies about the death of Charlie Kirk. In a debate with Andrew Wilson, she offered zero evidence, not even bad evidence, to defend her position that Robinson was a patsy with Israel and France involved.

Even if a person sincerely believes that Tyler Robinson was not the murderer of Charlie Kirk, Candace Owens absolving Lindsay Clancy discredits her entire defense of Tyler Robinson. It chooses sisterhood over virtue and the interests of justice. It paints Owens not as a genuine believer but as a caricature.

Owens defending Clancy was predictable not because of any similarity in the case or a preponderance of the evidence, but because they are both high-profile. Her audience expects her to disagree with the “official narrative” and shows up to hear it. Perhaps Candace Owens is a slave to the grift of defending the indefensible because of subjective feelings and vibes. There are people who genuinely believe that Tyler Robinson is innocent, but the inability of Candace Owens to plead his case indicates that she is not one of them.

Receive the Evangelical Dark Web Newsletter

Get Christian news in your inbox. Sign up and receive a free copy of Winning Not Winsome.

Support the Evangelical Dark Web

By becoming a member of Evangelical Dark Web, you get access to more content, help drive the direction of our research, and support the operations of the ministry.
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
Reddit
LinkedIn

2 Responses

  1. Regardless of exactly how it happened, it seems obvious that Charlie Kirk was eliminated by the zionists/jews, because he was “going off the reservation” and becoming increasingly hostile to both zionism and jewish influence within the USA.

    Until around 2022, Charlie Kirk was an obedient shill for the jewish lobby. He rabidly shilled for “israel”, denounced “anti-semitism” as a “brain virus”, promoted homosexuality and LGBT, supported open borders, said that the population of the USA should be increased to 500 million because “we have a lot of space”, said that green cards should be stapled to diplomas for foreign students, and even had the nerve to claim that the Founding Fathers wanted a multi-racial society.

    Then around 2022, Charlie Kirk started to change. He realized that he was rapidly losing support among young conservatives by promoting boomertard-style Reagan cuckservatism. Futhermore, his podcast interactions with his audience forced him to confront truths about jewish subversive influence which he had previously ignored.

    Also, around 2022 or 2023 Kirk seems to have grown that rarest quality among Conservative Inc influencers: a conscience. It seems that after years of betraying his country and his people by shilling for the jews, Kirk was finally getting tired of being a groveling jewish mouthpiece.

    The horrific and brutal genocide of the Palestinians also deeply affected Kirk. This is to his credit, and shows that he had a conscience and human decency, unlike the vast majority of “conservative” influencers who are corrupt sociopaths.

    Kirk denounced the zionist genocide of the Palestinian people, and Kirk also began asking questions about the official zionist narrative: in the world’s most fortified country, how could the October 7th attack have happened? Kirk even suggested that perhaps October 7th was intentionally orchestrated by the “israeli” government to provide a pretext for exterminating the Palestinians.

    Additionally, Kirk became increasingly vocal in mentioning jewish subversive influence and the leading role of the jews in the destruction of western civilization.

    We know from the texts posthumously released by Candace Owens that Kirk was aware of the talmud, and how judaism teaches that Gentiles are subhuman animals who only exist to serve the jews as slaves.

    Kirk also pushed back when the jewish lobby tried to pressure him into continuing to do their bidding.

    By 2025, the jewish lobby realized the Kirk was going the “Tucker Carlson route” and rejecting jewish control.

    The jews were aware that if the leader of the biggest conservative youth organization turned against them, that would be a huge blow to jewish influence over the next generation of conservatives.

    Throughout the year 2025, the jewish lobby made repeated attempts to bring Kirk back under their total control. These efforts culminated in the infamous meeting in Long Island where certain jewish donors and influencers threatened Kirk and tried to intimidate him. When that didn’t work, they had Netanyahu invite Kirk to earthly imposter “israel” for re-education, and offered to double Turning Point’s annual budget.

    Kirk refused these offers, at which point it seems that the zionists/jewish lobby made the decision to eliminate him.

    Exactly how it happened is anyone’s guess.

    Some people claim that Robinson was the assassin.

    Other people claim that Robinson was a Lee Harvey Oswald style patsy, and that there was another shooter whose bullet actually hit Charlie.

    Still others allege that the Rode microphone Charlie was wearing exploded or fired a lethal charge into Charlie. This theory is influenced by the exploding pagers that the “israelis” used in Lebanon.

    Still others suspect that Charlie’s own security guards murdered him, perhaps after putting him into the car.

    I don’t claim to know exactly how it happened.

    What I do know is that there are countless highly suspicious circumstances and unanswered questions surrounding the events that day.

    Anyone who doesn’t believe the official narrative is denounced and smeared as “demonic” by treasonous lying zionist shills such as Brandon Tatum, Andrew Kolvet, and the loathsome creep Frank Turek (who looks like a pedophile).

    Imagine being smeared as “demonic” simply because you want to find out the truth about who really committed a murder.

    It reeks of how the (((pharisees))) falsely claimed that Jesus was possessed by a demon, because Jesus refused to submit to the (((pharisees))).

    Just as Jesus was smeared and falsely accused of being demon-possessed by the jews because Jesus refused to submit to jewish power, in the same way the fake “Christian” shills for the jews are using the “demonic” smear against anyone who is actually loyal to Jesus Christ and refuses to submit to the evil jews and (((their))) lies.

    The REAL demons are the Frank Turek and Brandon Tatum types who betray Jesus Christ and betray America, in exchange for jewish money.

Leave a Reply

Receive the Evangelical Dark Web Newsletter

Get Christian news in your inbox. Sign up and receive a free copy of Winning Not Winsome.
Join 10015 other subscribers

Trending Posts