The Manosphere has long been critical of marriage and multiple players in the game have advocated sowing wild oats like Andrew Tate and Rollo Tomassi. Pearl Davis is perhaps more nuanced catering to a class of people blackpilled on marriage and women and people pursuing traditional lifestyle. Last week, a lot of beef happened between the prominent YouTube and multiple Daily Wire staffers, most notably Matt Walsh over her comments on marriage.
THERE'S A REASON WHY THE REDPILL TELLS MEN TO BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT MARRIAGE.— H. Pearl Davis (@pearlythingz) September 24, 2023
And no, it's not because we want them to be alone and miserable. It's because we don't want them to be divorced, financially crippled, separated from their children, and alone and miserable.
In summary, Pearl Davis advocates caution on marriage because of the divorce court system heavily skews in favor towards women. Yet ultimately, Pearl Davis serves as a blackpill on marriage citing the exaggerated 50% divorce statistic, to say that the risk of divorce outweighs the benefits of marriage.
The issue you’re also going to get with tradcons is they are typically above average in some way. The live a different reality. Tall, wealthy men, successful are better able to recover after a divorce.— H. Pearl Davis (@pearlythingz) September 22, 2023
It’s the average men. The truck drivers, construction workers, the plumbers… pic.twitter.com/lBrJXI9KxU
Matt Walsh pushed back on this, and while Pearl Davis complains about the Daily Wire getting personal rather than addressing her arguments, Pearly Things brings Matt Walsh’s marriage into this.
Apparently the fact that Matt Walsh is relatively new to the bigtime money in Conservative Inc (compared to say Glenn Beck, Ben Shapiro, or Mark Levin) is lost on Davis who attempts to cite Matt Walsh’s personal wealth.
“But divorce rates are going down slightly and I just don’t understand stats ahhh” https://t.co/i3Ii14T4M0— H. Pearl Davis (@pearlythingz) September 24, 2023
Pearl Davis responds to critics pointing out her lack of statistical understanding by pointing to a line chart that undermines her points. The decline in marriage rates can easily be correlated and perhaps causal to the a decrease in happiness and satisfaction, as we know married people live longer and are happier.
There will be no point in anyone getting married and having kids unless President Trump wins in 2024.— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) September 24, 2023
I hope more people my age come to realize very soon that the country will be over if President Trump doesn’t win.
America will collapse and there won’t be a country to raise a… https://t.co/q5NKFCbbIO
But it’s not just the risk of divorce that’s too great. Pearl Davis retweeted Laura Loomer repeating that she would not get married or have children if Trump does not win in 2024. This too is grossly unbiblical, which is unsurprising from Loomer, a pagan.
Part of the problem is that a lot of these alleged right wing “influencers” have no coherent world view at all and they don’t understand the forces they’re pretending to fight against. That’s why they end up just becoming the thing they supposedly despise.— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 24, 2023
Ultimately, Matt Walsh is right. Pearl Davis is coming to many conclusions as feminists, which is the result of her obvious clout chasing.
Peal Davis is not trying to have a discussion on family court reform. She does not consider whether men should sign prenups with women who have high body counts to mitigate the risk of divorce. She jumps straight to the provocative fearmongering about marriage because that’s what will benefit the media career she transparently admits she’s seeking.