The Southern Baptist Convention is embroiled in numerous lawsuits and one of the most salacious lawsuits is Johnny Hunt’s lawsuit due to the high salary claims by Hunt and the titillating nature of the alleged defamation. The Sex Abuse Task Force Report produced by Guidepost Solutions was an “independent” investigation that promised to uncover sex abuse and sex abuse coverups within the Southern Baptist Convention and the SBC Executive Committee. But no allegations of sex abuse or coverups were uncovered in the investigation that rehashed Paige Patterson and promoted Jennifer Lyell as an abuse victim despite her being an adult woman in a twelve-year-long relationship. Johnny Hunt was the biggest revelation of the investigation, in that he was accused of sexual assault. This has resulted in a lawsuit where Hunt is claiming damages of $600K in lost wages from his position with the North American Mission Board, a SBC Cooperative Program entity.
Johnny Hunt is seeking top dollar for his damages which include emotional, reputational harm, punitive, and loss of income through various streams. One such stream was his tenure as the senior VP of ministry for the North American Mission Board. He transitioned to this lofty position from being the pastor of FBC Woodstock in 2018.
According to the statement of damages, Johnny Hunt claims that his loss of salary plus net benefits is well beyond a six-figure income. In the document, Johnny Hunt is seeking no less than $6,710,000 which amounts to $610,000 per year for 11 years. Johnny Hunt also showcases the luxury incomes of Big Eva pastors. In addition to a millionaire salary at an evangelism organization, one that does not disclose salaries, Hunt also demands $360,000 per year for lost book sales, $350,000 in lost speaking engagements, and an additional $880,000 in miscellaneous income, all for 11 years each. This totals $15,400,000, and Johnny Hunt is demanding compensation.
Contrary to belief, this lawsuit was not the beginning of allegations of insane salaries over at the North American Mission Board, but Hunt’s claims do raise further questions about the lack of financial transparency with NAMB.
NAMB has responded with a statement that does not address Hunt’s claims specifically.
There has been some speculation online about the salary of a former NAMB employee.
While NAMB can’t share confidential salary information about any current or former employee or comment specifically on active litigation, no one at NAMB — now or at any time — has ever been paid anywhere near as much as the salary amount that is being speculated online.
The court filing which appears to have given rise to this online speculation is publicly available, and it does not mention NAMB by name. There is no way to factually conclude from that document what the plaintiff or any other employee was being paid by NAMB. It is regrettable that some parties have drawn conclusions and spread them around the Internet. Unfortunately, none of these parties contacted NAMB first for confirmation or denial.
At NAMB we are grateful for every dollar Southern Baptists have entrusted to us, and we strive to be the very best stewards of those resources. You can read more about that on our Financial Transparency and Accountability page.
While Hunt’s lawsuit cites the lost wages, it does not specifically mention NAMB in the same document, but what other organization was Johnny Hunt working for 11 years? This statement calls Hunt a liar in a rather pussyfooted manner.
NAMB falsely claims they are not able to show employee salaries, for which Hunt’s alleged salary would not be the only source of outrage. Moreover, the $610,000 per year for 11 years is total compensation, not base salary. NAMB is denying that they paid a salary close to $600,000; however, they do not specify total compensation.
As the trial date approaches, the Southern Baptist Convention is at risk of things going exceedingly bad for them as Hunt is demanding a golden lifeboat and the Southern Baptist Convention has a liquidity crisis because of all this lawsuits resulting from their embrace of the Me Too Movement.





3 Responses
I believe that Lyell is telling the truth about being assaulted.
I don’t. I am certain that behaviors inappropriate for actual Christians occurred on all sides of the apparent 12 year(!?!) relationship. But waiting 15 years to reveal alleged “abuse”? Why not go to the police the day it happened – if it did? The more I read about this sorry story, the more it sounds like a jilted lover finally discovers her man is already married to somebody else and it’s time for revenge.
I say, a pox on all their houses – including the SBC “holier-then thou” executive committee that’s too big for its britches and trying desperately to cover up something – maybe a bunch of somethings. I am a university professor, too, and the “Billy Graham Rule” has served me well for over twenty years. Hey, baptist men: do not under any circumstances be in a room alone with a woman who is not your own wife. Worked for Rev. Dr. Graham, works for me…it’ll work for you, too. Not even an elevator – if a woman gets on when you are otherwise alone, then you get off before the door closes with no apology and no explanation needed. No office calls, no counseling sessions without witnesses in the room and the door is never closed, no meetings after class one-on-one…no nothing.
Why any woman would willingly attend a southern baptist seminary is just beyond me.
“But waiting 15 years to reveal alleged “abuse”? Why not go to the police the day it happened – if it did?”
There are many, many reasons why victims don’t report abuse when it happens.
Maybe she was afraid of retaliation by the perpetrator. Maybe he threatened her.
Maybe she was afraid that the church congregation would blame HER for what happened and brand her as a “jezebel” who “caused the holy pastor to stumble.”
Maybe she was afraid that her church community would shun/ostracize her.
Maybe she was afraid that nobody would believe her.
Maybe she was too traumatized and ashamed and humiliated to report it when it happened.
Maybe the perpetrator gaslighted her into wrongly believing that she was at fault for “causing him to stumble”.
Maybe the perpetrator manipulated and gaslighted her by saying something like: “do you want me to go to prison for years and have my life ruined?”
Maybe the perpetrator manipulated and gaslighted her into having feelings of love for him.
Maybe she was afraid that if she revealed that she was a victim of sexual assault, she would be stigmatized and men wouldn’t want to date/marry her in the future.
Maybe she didn’t want to go through the distress and trauma of having to describe and re-live what happened in a police interview, testify publicly in court, etc.
Her motives for keeping the abuse to herself and only reporting it now doesn’t matter.
The only thing that matters is whether her allegations are true.
If she is telling the truth, the pastor is a sex offender.